Measuring the effectiveness of non-drug interventions
More and more families, caregivers, and professionals are turning to non-drug interventions to support an elderly person: memory workshops, adapted physical activity, music therapy, cognitive stimulation on tablets, therapeutic gardening, relaxation sessions. These approaches are valuable because they do not add medication, they respect the person, and they act on what really matters in daily life: mood, autonomy, social connection, the pleasure of doing. But one question keeps coming back, legitimate and a bit intimidating: how do we know that "it works"?
This article takes the time to answer this question without unnecessary jargon. It explains what "measuring effectiveness" means, why a favorable impression is not always enough, what benchmarks and tools help clarify things, and how to observe the effects of an activity on an elderly relative without turning into an anxious evaluator. It is aimed at both families and healthcare professionals, and it does not replace any medical advice: it provides you with a better understanding, better observation, and better dialogue with the people who support your relative.
The essentials in 30 seconds
A non-drug intervention (NDI) is a health action based on knowledge, without medication: adapted physical activity, cognitive stimulation, art therapy, psychological support, nutritional approaches. Measuring its effectiveness means verifying that it produces a real and useful effect, not just a pleasant one at the moment.
- A starting point — without an initial state noted before starting, nothing can be compared later. Measurement begins before the activity, not after.
- Concrete indicators — mood, sleep, autonomy in daily tasks, participation, memory, agitation: we choose what matters for the person.
- Validated tools — recognized scales (autonomy, quality of life, mood) exist and are used by professionals; at home, a simple observation notebook is already sufficient.
- Known pitfalls — novelty effect, desire to do well, natural evolution: several phenomena can create the illusion of an effect. Knowing them helps avoid mistakes.
- A team effort — the most useful measurement is the one that is shared with healthcare professionals, who make the diagnosis and interpret the evolution.
What is a non-drug intervention ?
Before measuring the effectiveness of something, one must first know what is being discussed. A non-drug intervention — often abbreviated as NDI — refers to a health action that does not rely on taking medication, but still aims for a specific effect on health, well-being, or autonomy. This includes adapted physical activity, cognitive stimulation, music therapy, art therapy, nutritional approaches, relaxation, psychological support, and health education programs.
The High Authority of Health became interested in these non-drug therapies in the early 2010s and the need to better evaluate them, emphasizing that their widespread use does not exempt from verifying what they actually provide. More recently, academic work, particularly those conducted around the CEPS Platform at the University of Montpellier, has proposed to precisely define NDI as a non-invasive, targeted, and data-driven intervention, in order to distinguish it from simple wellness practices. This distinction is not an administrative detail : it is precisely what makes measurement possible.
What distinguishes an NDI from a simple enjoyable activity
A walk, a card game, or a song feels good : no one doubts that, and it is already an excellent reason to propose them. But talking about intervention implies something more : a defined objective in advance, a thoughtful way of doing, and the intention to achieve an identifiable effect. It is this intention that allows the question “ does it work ?”. We do not measure the effectiveness of pleasure ; we measure that of an action we implement to achieve a goal.
A goal
Improving mood, maintaining memory, reducing agitation, sustaining walking : the NDI aims for something specific, not “ well-being ” in general.
A method
A thoughtful and repeated way of doing : duration, frequency, progression. It is this regular framework that then allows for comparison before and after.
An observable effect
We choose in advance what we will look at to know if the action produces the expected result, rather than judging “ by impression ” afterwards.
Major families of interventions
To find one's way, non-drug interventions are often classified into a few major categories: physical approaches (adapted physical activity, physiotherapy, fall prevention), psychological and cognitive approaches (cognitive stimulation, psychological support, speech therapies), nutritional approaches, and so-called mind-body or expressive approaches (music therapy, art therapy, relaxation, reminiscence). Today, digital interventions are added to these categories, such as stimulation applications on tablets, which extend what is done in workshops to the home. Each aims for different effects, and it is this very diversity that requires choosing the right way to measure each activity: one does not evaluate a singing workshop the same way one evaluates a walking program.
Measuring does not mean turning every shared moment into a test. An activity can remain joyful, free, and spontaneous while also being subject to some regular observations alongside. The goal is not to grade your loved one, but to ensure that the time and energy invested truly serve their needs.
Why measure, and not just feel
“Since he started his memory exercises, I find him better.” This phrase is heard by professionals every week, and it is precious: the feelings of a loved one who has known the person for decades often outweigh a single number. However, relying solely on impressions has well-known limits. Our memory of past states is fragile: we forget how difficult a situation was three months ago, and we compare the present to a memory that is already blurry.
Measuring, at its core, is giving oneself a means to verify an impression rather than giving up on it. This meets three very concrete needs for a family as well as for a caregiver.
| Need | What measurement brings |
|---|---|
| Decide whether to continue or not | An activity requires time, sometimes money, often travel. Knowing if it brings something helps avoid exhausting oneself for nothing — or giving up too early on something that was starting to bear fruit. |
| Adjust the intervention | Observing allows one to identify what works and what tires, and to adapt the pace, difficulty, or time of day rather than stopping everything. |
| Engage in dialogue with caregivers | Regularly dated observations are much more valuable in consultations than a “it's going okay.” They guide decisions and avoid hasty conclusions. |
The trap of “we'll see”
Without a noted reference at the start, a family often finds itself helpless six months later, unable to say whether the situation has improved, stabilized, or deteriorated. Yet this information is crucial: for a fragile elderly person, maintaining a level of autonomy can already be an excellent result, even without spectacular progress. However, to recognize this, one must have kept a record of the initial state. Measurement is therefore not an additional constraint: it gives meaning to all the efforts already made.
Levels of evidence, explained simply
When a professional claims that an approach is “ validated ” or “ promising ”, they rely on a central idea of evidence-based medicine: not all ways of knowing are equal. An isolated testimony does not carry the same weight as a study comparing hundreds of people. Understanding this hierarchy helps to read information discerningly, without being impressed by a promise that seems too good or rejecting by principle what has proven effective.
| Type of evidence | What it is | What it’s worth |
|---|---|---|
| The testimony | “ It worked for my mother ” | Valuable as a lead, insufficient as evidence : we do not know if the effect comes from the activity or something else. |
| The observational study | We follow a group of people who engage in an activity | Useful, but does not say if the people are better because of the activity or for another reason. |
| The comparative trial | We compare a group that benefits from the intervention to a group that does not | Much more solid : the comparison allows attributing the effect to the intervention. |
| The systematic review | We gather and analyze all serious studies on a question | The most reliable level : it is the synthesis of numerous works, as done by Cochrane reviews. |
The Cochrane reviews, an international reference in knowledge synthesis, have particularly focused on cognitive stimulation in elderly people with mild to moderate cognitive disorders, and conclude that there is an interest in certain functions and quality of life. Remember especially the logic : a claim gains strength when it is based not on a case, but on repeated, comparative, and convergent works.
A second idea deserves to be understood : that of the comparison group. In a serious trial, we do not just follow the people who benefit from the activity ; we compare them to others, similar, who do not benefit from it. Why? Because without a point of comparison, it is impossible to know if an improvement comes from the intervention or would have occurred anyway. This is exactly the problem faced by a family : they do not have a “ double ” of their loved one living without the activity. Hence the importance, in the absence of this, to very precisely note the starting state : this initial state becomes your only point of comparison, and that is what makes the home measurement honest rather than illusory.
Finally, keep in mind that research speaks of averages over groups. An intervention can be beneficial “ on average ” without being suitable for your loved one in particular, and the reverse is also true. That is why scientific data guide the choice, but do not decide for you : it is individual observation, over time, that determines for a given person.
Many beneficial activities have not been the subject of large studies, simply because they are difficult to evaluate in a laboratory. The absence of evidence is not proof of ineffectiveness. It is an invitation to observe oneself, methodically, the effects on the person concerned — which is precisely the purpose of this article.
Choosing the right indicators to follow
Measuring the effectiveness of non-drug interventions starts with a simple but decisive decision: what are we going to look at? We cannot track everything, and wanting to measure everything leads to not measuring anything seriously. The right indicator is the one that corresponds to the objective of the activity and that really matters to the person and their surroundings. A singing workshop does not primarily aim to improve a memory score; it may aim for mood, calmness, or the pleasure of participating. So that is what needs to be observed.
The main families of indicators
Mood and morale
Smiles, desire to talk, less frequent complaints, renewed interest in an activity. Mood is often the first indicator to change, and one of the most important.
Sleep
Falling asleep, nighttime awakenings, evening restlessness. A well-timed activity during the day can ease the often difficult end of the day.
Cognition
Memory of recent events, attention, ability to follow a conversation or instruction, orientation in time and space.
Autonomy
Daily tasks: dressing, washing, eating alone, preparing a simple meal, managing medications. This is often the most concrete issue.
Social connection
Participation in group activities, exchanges with loved ones, openness to other residents or visitors.
Behavioral disorders
Restlessness, anxiety, opposition, wandering. A decrease in frequency or intensity is a valuable indicator, including for those around.
Objective indicators and perceived indicators
We distinguish two main ways of measuring, which are complementary. Objective indicators are counted or observed from the outside: number of nighttime awakenings, walking distance, number of episodes of restlessness, time spent on an activity. Perceived indicators — which professionals sometimes refer to as “reported measures” — capture the experience of the person themselves: do they feel better, less anxious, more useful? For seniors, including when speech becomes difficult, this perception retains its value and should be sought as much as possible, through words, facial expression, or attitude.
| Objective of the intervention | Priority indicator to follow | How to simply observe it |
|---|---|---|
| Reduce evening anxiety | Frequency and intensity of restlessness at the end of the day | Note each evening, on a scale of 0 to 3, the level of restlessness |
| Maintain memory | Ability to recall memories, to follow a conversation | Identify moments of fluidity, words recalled, shared stories |
| Maintain walking | Distance walked, ease, number of breaks | Choose the same reference route and compare it over time |
| Encourage social connection | Participation and exchanges during group activities | Note presence, duration of participation, interactions |
| Improve morale | Smiles, initiatives, complaints, appetite | One word a day in a notebook is enough to outline a trend |
Tools and measurement scales
Health professionals have standardized tools to objectively assess the progress of an elderly person. You do not have to handle them yourself, but knowing them helps to understand what the doctor, psychologist, or care team observes, and why they sometimes repeat the same tests a few months apart. These repetitions are not routine: they are precisely used to measure progress.
The scales used by professionals
| Domain | Type of tool | What it evaluates |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive functions | Screening tests like the MMSE or MoCA | Memory, attention, language, orientation. Used by professionals to objectify and monitor, never to make a diagnosis alone. |
| Autonomy | Scales of activities of daily living (ADL and IADL type) | Ability to perform essential actions and more complex tasks of daily life. |
| Mood | Geriatric depression scale (GDS) | Detection of a depressive state, common and underdiagnosed in elderly people. |
| Behavior | Behavioral disorder inventories | Frequency and intensity of agitation, anxiety, apathy. |
| Quality of life | Questionnaires dedicated to elderly people | The overall experience, often gathered from the person and their surroundings. |
These tools have a huge advantage: they are validated, meaning tested on many people to verify that they accurately measure what they claim to measure, and that they provide comparable results from one time to another. This is what allows us to say that a change is real and not due to the randomness of the day. However, their interpretation is up to trained professionals: the same score can have very different meanings depending on the context, fatigue, education level, or mood at the moment.
At home: simple but regular tools
You do not need a sophisticated scale or software to contribute effectively to the measurement. A notebook, a calendar, or a printed chart is sufficient, provided they are filled out regularly. The DYNSEO tool catalog offers free printable resources, such as observation grids, to keep a simple and dated record of what you observe over the weeks. To establish an initial cognitive benchmark before starting an activity, the online cognitive tests, including the memory test, provide a starting point: they do not make any diagnosis, but they give a basis for comparison later.
To compare two moments, you must measure the same thing, in the same way, under similar conditions. Weighing an object one day with a scale and the next day by hand says nothing about its progress. In practice: same walking route, same time of day, same scale from 0 to 3. The consistency of the method matters more than its sophistication.
A stimulation tool that also helps you track progress
SCARLETT, the memory games app designed for seniors, offers exercises with adjustable difficulty and tracking of completed activities: a simple way to stimulate and, at the same time, keep a record of regularity.
Discover SCARLETTA simple method to measure at home
Good news: seriously assessing an activity with a loved one does not require special skills, just a little method and consistency. Here is a five-step approach, applicable to both a memory workshop and a return to walking or music sessions. It applies to both home and the facility.
- Define a clear objective. Formulate in one sentence what you hope for: “that he is less agitated in the evening,” “that she continues to walk to the bakery,” “that he finds pleasure in talking again.” A vague objective cannot be measured.
- Note the starting state. Before starting the activity, describe the current situation: over a week, how many evenings of agitation? What walking distance? This is your point of comparison, and it cannot be recreated later.
- Implement the activity regularly. Consistency is more important than intensity. A short daily session generally provides more than a long weekly session. Keep the same framework for several weeks before judging.
- Observe and record. A few dated words are enough: date, activity, reaction, chosen indicator. The notebook transforms scattered impressions into a readable trend.
- Review at fixed intervals. Every four to six weeks, reread your notes and compare with the starting state. Progress, stability, regression? Then decide: continue, adjust, or discuss with the healthcare professional.
With the person, stay in encouragement and never in judgment. To say: “I noticed that you are finding your words more easily these days, it makes me happy.” ❌ To avoid: “You remember less well than before, did you see?” Measurement is a tool for you and the care team, not a mirror held up to the person to highlight their difficulties. An elderly person who feels evaluated or tested becomes discouraged; an elderly person who feels supported engages.
How long before concluding?
This is a common question and there is no single answer. Some effects, like calming during a music session, are observed immediately. Others, like maintaining autonomy or preserving memory, can only be seen over several weeks, or even months. As a general rule, it is wise to let an activity settle for at least four to six weeks before drawing conclusions, while monitoring that it does not cause excessive fatigue, rejection, or anxiety. If the activity exhausts or worries the person, do not wait: adjust or stop, and discuss it.
A concrete example, step by step
Let's take a common situation, without names or real cases, to give substance to the method. An elderly loved one becomes more agitated in the late afternoon, a often difficult period. The family wishes to introduce daily music listening, with songs from their youth, to calm them. Here’s how an honest measurement would unfold.
The goal is simply stated: reduce agitation between 5 PM and 7 PM. The starting state is noted over a week, without changing anything: each evening, a number from 0 to 3 for the intensity of agitation. Let's assume that the first week fluctuates around 2 to 3 most evenings. The activity is then introduced: about twenty minutes of listening, every day, at the same time, under the same conditions. The family continues to note the same number each evening, without letting themselves be influenced by the desire for it to work. After five weeks, they review their notes. If the evenings are now more around 1, the trend is encouraging and the activity deserves to be continued. If nothing has changed, they question the chosen moment, the duration, the repertoire, or try something else. In both cases, the family arrives at the consultation with dated facts, not an impression: the health professional then has solid material to decide with them.
This example illustrates the essential point: measuring honestly is not complicated; it mainly requires consistency and a bit of honesty with oneself. The same pattern applies to resuming walking, memory exercises, or a reminiscence workshop; only the goal and the indicator change.
The traps that distort evaluation
Measuring honestly assumes knowing the phenomena that can mislead us. They are nothing to be ashamed of: they affect everyone, including researchers, and it is precisely to guard against this that science invented comparison groups. At home, we cannot eliminate them, but we can keep them in mind to avoid overinterpreting a result.
The novelty effect
A new activity stimulates simply by its novelty. The enthusiasm of the first weeks may wane: it is by observing over time that one distinguishes a true benefit from a mere curiosity effect.
The attention effect
Often, it is not the activity itself that helps, but the presence, the gaze, and the time given. This is good news: the relationship also heals. But it invites us not to attribute an effect too quickly to a specific content.
The natural evolution
A person's state varies spontaneously from day to day, from season to season. An improvement may coincide with an activity without resulting from it. Hence the importance of observing over a sufficient duration.
The desire to do well
When one invests a lot, there is a desire for it to work, and one sometimes sees progress where there is none yet. Noting concrete facts, rather than impressions, helps keep one's feet on the ground.
How to limit these biases without a laboratory
You will not conduct a clinical trial in your living room, and that is not the goal. But a few simple reflexes enhance the reliability of your observations: note specific facts rather than judgments (“walked to the park without a break” rather than “was in good shape”); date everything; observe over several weeks; and, if possible, have another person in your circle review your notes, as their fresh perspective will correct yours. Finally, beware of conclusions drawn from a single good — or bad — day: it is the trend that matters, not the anecdote.
No activity, no matter how beneficial, cures a neurodegenerative disease or guarantees a result. A non-drug intervention can support autonomy, mood, and quality of life; it does not replace medical follow-up or prescribed treatments. Beware of any program, product, or device that promises certain or spectacular results: in health, caution and verification are better than sold hope.
What to expect from non-drug interventions
To measure without disappointment, you need realistic expectations. Here, category by category, is what the major families of non-drug interventions most often aim for in seniors, and the type of effect that can be expected to observe. These guidelines remain general: each person is different, and only individual follow-up will determine what is suitable for your loved one.
| Intervention | Main goal | Relevant indicator to observe |
|---|---|---|
| Adapted physical activity | Maintaining walking, balance, fall prevention, morale | Walking distance and ease, number of falls, mood |
| Cognitive stimulation | Maintaining attention, working memory, enjoyment of mental effort | Regularity, engagement, ease in daily exchanges |
| Music therapy | Calming, reducing anxiety and agitation, shared emotion | Level of agitation, facial expression, participation |
| Art therapy, creative activities | Expression, self-esteem, pleasure of creating | Desire to participate, expressed pride, mood |
| Reminiscence, memory workshops | Social connection, identity, valuing life journey | Richness of stories, exchanges, smiles |
| Nutrition approaches | General state, energy, prevention of malnutrition | Appetite, weight monitored by a professional, vitality |
Maintenance is already a result
This is one of the most important messages of this article, and one of the most misunderstood. For a fragile elderly person or one affected by a progressive disease, the realistic goal is not always progress: it is often stability, or a slowing of decline. An activity that helps your loved one maintain their ability to dress independently, participate in family meals, or recognize their grandchildren fully fulfills its mission, even if no “score” increases. Without measuring the starting state, this maintenance goes unnoticed; with it, we recognize and value it appropriately.
Beware of expected effects and unexpected effects
Measuring is also about being attentive to what one did not expect. An activity can produce a desired effect on one level and an undesired effect on another: a too intense exercise program can improve fitness but increase fatigue; a group workshop can delight one person and exhaust another, who is more sensitive to noise and crowds. A good evaluation is therefore not limited to checking that the objective is achieved; it keeps an open eye on the overall picture: sleep, appetite, mood, fatigue. It is by crossing several indicators, and not by fixing just one, that one honestly judges whether an intervention truly serves the person as a whole.
An evaluation focused solely on cognitive performance misses the essential. Pleasure, calmness, the feeling of being useful and connected to others matter just as much, sometimes more, for an elderly person. A workshop that does not improve any test but makes afternoons sweeter and nights calmer is a success. Quality of life is a standalone indicator that should never be neglected.
The role of professionals and transmission
Measuring at home is useful; transmitting what has been measured is even more so. Families occupy an irreplaceable place: they know the person in their daily life, over time, in situations that the professional never sees in consultation. But the interpretation of an evolution, the diagnosis, the prognosis, and the care decisions fall to health professionals. The most valuable measurement is therefore the one that circulates between these two worlds.
Who does what
| Actor | Their contribution to measurement |
|---|---|
| The family, the close caregiver | Observes daily life, notes dated facts, reports changes, provides the person's lived experience |
| The attending physician, the geriatrician | Interprets the evolution, adjusts care, coordinates, makes the diagnosis |
| The physiotherapist, the occupational therapist | Evaluates mobility, autonomy, and adaptations, with dedicated tools |
| The speech therapist, the neuropsychologist | Evaluates language and cognitive functions with validated tests |
| The psychologist | Evaluates mood, supports the person and their surroundings |
| The facilitator, the activity professional | Observes participation and engagement during workshops, both in facilities and at home |
Effectively transmitting observations
A consultation lasts a short time, and emotion often makes one forget what they wanted to say. Preparing your observations in advance changes everything. Bring dated facts rather than general impressions, report what has changed and since when, mention what the person themselves expresses, and ask your questions in order of priority. A liaison notebook or a tracking grid makes this sharing much more effective than a reconstructed account from memory. You do not have to interpret: your role is to provide reliable material to those for whom it is their job.
The long-term measurement never replaces immediate vigilance. A sudden worsening — new confusion, fall, loss of speech, discomfort, intense pain — is not a subject for evaluation: it is a situation that may require calling the treating physician or emergency services in your country without delay. Observing over time and reacting quickly in emergencies are two different reflexes, and both are essential.
What really helps, what is useless
After this overview, here is a practical summary. On one side, the reflexes that make the measurement of non-drug interventions reliable and useful; on the other, the habits that distort it or make it discouraging. Keep this in mind when you start.
| ✅ What helps | ❌ What does not help |
|---|---|
| Note the starting state before beginning | Jump in without a reference and then try to remember “how it was before” |
| Choose one or two indicators that matter to the person | Want to measure everything at once and end up tracking nothing |
| Observe over several weeks, look at the trend | Conclude based on a single good or bad day |
| Note dated and precise facts | Be satisfied with vague and changing impressions |
| Recognize maintenance as a real result | Only expect progress and get discouraged without it |
| Include quality of life and pleasure in the evaluation | Judge only based on numerical performances |
| Share your observations with health professionals | Interpret alone, or decide to stop care without advice |
| Adjust or stop if the activity causes fatigue or anxiety | Persevere at all costs because you believed in it |
Keep in mind the spirit of the approach: measuring the effectiveness of non-drug interventions is not about becoming a scientist, it's simply about replacing “I think it's getting better” with “here is what I observe, regularly, since such date.” This small change in posture benefits your loved one, yourself, and the team that supports them — and it gives meaning to every proposed activity.
To go further
This article is part of a series dedicated to supporting seniors and cognitive stimulation. Each of these guides sheds light on a complementary aspect:
Daily lifeEstablishing a cognitive stimulation routine at home, step by step
ObserveIdentifying cognitive warning signs in an elderly loved one without dramatizing
SupportSupporting the caregiver: preserving their balance for the long term
On the side of free resources, the DYNSEO tools catalog offers printable materials useful for objectifying and conveying what you observe, and the cognitive tests provide a first reference to keep as a point of comparison.
Frequently asked questions
Can we really measure the effectiveness of an activity at home ?
Yes, to a certain extent, as long as you remain modest and consistent. You will not conduct a scientific study, but you can certainly note a starting state, choose one or two indicators that matter to your loved one, observe over several weeks, and compare. This approach provides valuable information, especially if you record dated facts rather than impressions. It does not replace the evaluation of health professionals, who have validated tools and experience to interpret changes, but it very usefully complements it by bringing in the daily lived experience that the professional never sees in consultation.
How long does it take to know if an intervention works ?
It entirely depends on the objective. A calming effect, like that of a music session, can be observed immediately. On the other hand, maintaining autonomy or preserving memory can only be seen over several weeks or even months. Generally speaking, it is reasonable to allow an activity to settle for at least four to six weeks before concluding, while monitoring that it does not cause excessive fatigue, anxiety, or rejection. If the activity exhausts or worries the person, you do not wait : you adjust, reduce, or stop, and you discuss it with the care team without delay.
What should I do if I see no progress ?
First, do not confuse the absence of progress with the absence of benefit. For a fragile elderly person or someone with a progressive disease, maintaining a capacity or slowing down a decline is already a valuable result, which only a noted starting state allows you to recognize. Next, consider the pleasure and quality of life : an activity that calms evenings or makes days more pleasant fulfills its mission even without improving a test. Finally, talk to the health professionals who follow your loved one : they can adjust the approach, propose another one, or help you readjust your expectations.
Are online cognitive tests sufficient to evaluate a loved one ?
No, and it is important to know this. Online cognitive tests, like those offered by DYNSEO, are excellent tools for establishing a first benchmark, raising awareness, or tracking consistency, but they do not provide any diagnosis and do not replace a professional evaluation. A score can vary depending on fatigue, mood, screen habits, or education level. Use them as a starting point to keep, not as a verdict. If there is any doubt about your loved one's memory, attention, or autonomy, the right reflex is to talk to the primary care physician, who will refer to a specialist consultation if necessary.
How to measure without giving my loved one the impression of being tested ?
This is a valid concern, and the answer lies in the approach. Keep the balance for yourself and the care team: the observation notebook does not need to be brandished in front of the person. In the exchange, always prioritize encouragement over judgment, highlight what is going well rather than pointing out what is lacking, and let the activity remain a moment of pleasure and connection. An elderly person who feels supported engages; an elderly person who feels evaluated becomes discouraged. Observe discreetly, note alongside, and express only what values the person in front of you: this is the art of a respectful and caring approach.
This article is intended for general information. It does not replace a diagnosis, medical advice, or treatment. Non-drug interventions accompany care; they do not substitute for it. For any questions regarding health, autonomy, or the condition of a loved one, consult the attending physician or the care team that follows them ; in case of a sudden or concerning change, contact the emergency services in your country.
More than 30 cognitive stimulation games designed for seniors and vulnerable people, with gentle and progressive support, on tablet.
Discover →
Stimulate and track, in one gesture
SCARLETT brings together memory and attention games designed for seniors, with adjustable difficulty and activity tracking : a way to maintain abilities while keeping a concrete record of consistency, week after week.
Discover SCARLETTDid this content help you? Support DYNSEO 💙
We are a small team of 14 people based in Paris. For 13 years, we have been creating free content to help families, speech therapists, care homes and healthcare professionals.
Your feedback is the only way we know if our work is useful. A Google review helps us reach other families, caregivers and therapists who need it.
One action, 30 seconds: leave us a Google review ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐. It costs nothing, and it changes everything for us.
