Preventing burnout in your team: 8 concrete actions for managers
The manager is the first line of defense against burnout — and sometimes its primary cause. This operational guide provides frontline managers with 8 concrete actions, applicable starting tomorrow, to create a work environment that sustainably protects their team's mental health.
In this article
The associated training
Our printable notebooks
Research is clear: the direct manager is the most determining factor in preventing burnout within a team — more than HR policies, more than digital tools, more than salary benefits. It is the manager who sees the first signals, who can adjust the workload, who creates or destroys the feeling of psychological safety in the team. And it is also the manager who, if not trained and supported, can inadvertently become a major risk factor. This guide provides the 8 most effective, well-documented, and accessible actions to shift from a reactive posture (managing burnout when it occurs) to a preventive posture (creating the conditions that prevent it from occurring).
⚠️ Reminder: This guide helps managers to prevent and detect — not to diagnose or treat. When faced with a colleague showing serious signs of exhaustion, the manager's role is to engage in a caring conversation and direct them to appropriate resources (occupational health, EAP). They are not a therapist.
of the variance in employee engagement is explained by the quality of direct management — a single variable (Gallup, State of the Global Workplace, 2024)
of managers report being in a state of moderate to severe exhaustion themselves — a manager in burnout cannot protect their team (Malakoff Humanis, 2023)
the cost differential between early detected burnout and burnout that has reached decompensation — the economic argument for managerial prevention
of managers report never having been trained in detecting and preventing burnout (Empreinte Humaine / OpinionWay, 2024)
Regularly assess the actual workload — not perceived, not reported: actual
Work overload is the primary factor of burnout in all studies — and it is the factor over which the manager has the most direct control. However, assessing workload is more difficult than it seems. Most managers do not have an accurate view of what each team member does hour by hour — they work with impressions, deliverables, and statements. Yet, those most at risk of burnout are precisely those who report the least about their overload, for fear of appearing incompetent or disappointing.
A regular and structured assessment of actual workload involves simple tools: a dashboard of ongoing projects and deliverables for each member, a systematic question in individual meetings about perceived workload (on a scale of 1 to 10), and an analysis of overtime or connections outside of working hours. This last data point, often available in messaging tools (Teams, Slack, email), is one of the best leading indicators of overload — despite its non-declarative nature.
📋 Concrete actions
- Set up a weekly 15-minute meeting where each member rates their workload on a scale of 10 and identifies their three priorities for the week
- Create a visual dashboard of ongoing projects with estimated and actual workload per collaborator — detect chronic overloads before they settle in
- Analyze monthly the data of connections outside of contractual hours — if a collaborator regularly sends emails after 8 PM or on weekends, it is a signal to investigate
- Establish a team rule: any refusal of an additional task is acceptable and does not require justification — destigmatize the preventive "no"
Embodiment of the right to disconnect — and stop sending emails in the evening
The right to disconnect has been enshrined in the El Khomri law since 2017 (art. L2242-17 Labor Code). In practice, it is largely ignored in organizations, for a simple reason: the manager themselves does not respect it. Behavioral research is clear — employees replicate their manager's behavior. If the manager sends emails at 10 PM, if she posts on Teams on Sunday, if he responds to messages during his vacation: his team feels implicitly obliged to do the same, even without ever having received such an explicit injunction. Disconnection is a systemic behavior — it cannot be imposed downward without being practiced upward.
The first act of preventing burnout for the manager is therefore to change their own connection behavior. This requires a conscious effort and often an explicit conversation with their own manager — because the pressure for constant availability often comes from above. But it also requires clear communication with the team: “I can send emails outside of working hours when I think of something, but I do not expect a response before the next morning during the week.”
📋 Concrete actions
- Activate the "delayed sending" feature in their email — draft emails when they think of them, schedule them for 9 AM the next morning
- Explicitly communicate to the team that responding to messages outside of contractual hours is not expected and will not be valued
- Do not contact a collaborator during their leave unless it is a real and previously defined emergency — and define what "real emergency" means
- Include in the team agreement or charter a "guaranteed disconnection" time slot (e.g., no meetings before 9 AM, no emails after 6:30 PM)
Establish regular and well-structured individual meetings
The regular individual meeting (1:1) is the most effective management tool for preventing burnout — and is most often sacrificed in times of pressure or busy schedules, precisely when it would be most useful. A 30-minute weekly or biweekly 1:1 is not a reporting meeting — it is a space for dialogue about the reality experienced by the collaborator, their workload, their difficulties, their needs. It is in these spaces that the manager can detect early signals, where the collaborator can express a difficulty without having to create an exceptional event to do so.
The structure of the anti-burnout 1:1 systematically includes three dimensions: ongoing projects (operational), energy and perceived workload (state), and support needs (relationship). The third dimension is often omitted in traditional meetings — and it is precisely this dimension that generates the feeling of being seen and supported, which reduces the risk of exhaustion. A collaborator who knows that their manager will ask them “What do you need from me this week?” at every 1:1 develops a managerial relationship in which it is possible to say “I need to take a break.”
📋 Concrete actions
- Schedule recurring 1:1s in calendars — do not cancel them as a first intention when time is short
- Use a simple structure: Projects (10 min) → State / workload (10 min) → Needs / support (10 min)
- Systematically ask: “On a scale of 1 to 10, how are you doing in terms of energy this week?” — note the response over time
- If the response is below 5 for several consecutive weeks: deepen the conversation and propose concrete adjustments
Train your eye to weak signals — do not wait for the crash
The biggest obstacle to early detection of burnout is not the lack of goodwill from managers — it is the lack of training in what these signals actually look like. Most managers have an image of burnout as a sudden and visible break — a collaborator collapsing, crying, unable to do anything. This image is accurate for terminal cases, but it completely misses the weeks and months of discreet signals that precede this break and on which the manager could have acted.
Training your eye means developing specific attention to certain categories of behavioral change: changes in energy and enthusiasm levels, modifications in communication patterns (less verbal in meetings, shorter, more laconic responses), changes in the quality of work that deviate from the collaborator's usual standards, gradual social isolation within the team. This is precisely what the DYNSEO certified training Detecting and preventing burnout in your team develops in managers — a trained eye to read weak signals, calibrated to observable behaviors without ever entering the medical or private sphere.
📋 Concrete actions
- Take the DYNSEO certified training on detecting and preventing burnout — 100% online, at your own pace, Qualiopi certificate issued
- Keep a discreet observation journal for each team member: note observed behavioral changes without judgment or interpretation
- Establish a "baseline profile" for each collaborator (how are they usually?) to better detect significant deviations
- Share observed signals and best practices in manager meetings — the collective intelligence of middle management is an underutilized resource
Create an environment where showing limits is acceptable
Amy Edmondson (Harvard Business School) popularized the concept of psychological safety — the state of a team in which members feel able to take interpersonal risks without fear of judgment or punishment. This notion is directly related to burnout prevention: in a team with high psychological safety, collaborators can say “I am overloaded,” “I need help on this project,” or “I am not doing well this week” — without risking being labeled as unreliable or disengaged. In teams with low psychological safety, these signals remain hidden until decompensation.
Psychological safety is not a natural state — it is built through specific managerial behaviors, repeated over time. It involves how the manager reacts to mistakes (without punishing but by learning), to expressed vulnerability (without minimizing but by recognizing), and to unconventional ideas (without rejecting but by discussing). A manager who shares their own doubts, acknowledges their own mistakes, and expresses when they themselves are going through a more difficult period — normalizes these behaviors for the entire team.
📋 Concrete actions
- Start a weekly team meeting with a collective "weather" check — each member says in one word how they feel — and the manager starts with themselves sincerely
- Respond to mistakes without blame: “What do we learn from this?” rather than “How could this happen?”
- Explicitly thank collaborators who report an overload or difficulty — value the behavior to reinforce its future occurrence
- Openly share with the team their own periods of overload or uncertainty — the shared vulnerability of the manager is the most powerful factor in normalization
Adapt team rituals to integrate the question of well-being
Burnout prevention should not be an exceptional topic addressed in special meetings — it should be integrated into the team's ordinary rituals to become a cultural norm rather than an event. When the question of well-being and workload is regularly raised in usual rituals, it gradually loses its taboo character and becomes a normal conversation — just like project meetings or performance reviews.
Several rituals can be easily adapted to integrate this dimension. The weekly meeting can start with a team "weather" check (in 5 minutes, each person says a word about their state for the week). The monthly update can include a roundtable on workload (everyone votes anonymously from 1 to 5 to indicate where they stand). The project kickoff meeting can include a conversation about estimated workload and available capacity — before assigning roles. These rituals, maintained over time, create a team culture where discussing one's workload is as natural as discussing deliverables.
📋 Concrete actions
- Add 5 minutes of "team weather" at the beginning of each weekly meeting — a quick roundtable, without pressure to detail
- At project kickoff, explicitly ask: “Given your other commitments, what is your actual capacity for this project?” — before assigning roles
- At project closure, add a "well-being" point to the retrospective: “How did the period go for each of you personally?”
- Protect "no meeting" slots in collective calendars (e.g., Friday afternoons) to allow for concentration and deep work without interruptions
Guide to the right resources without crossing the boundaries of the role
One of the most frequent difficulties for managers when faced with a struggling collaborator is not knowing what to do “after” the opening conversation — and risking either getting too involved (substituting for the therapist) or not enough (abandoning the collaborator after identifying the situation). The compass is simple: the manager's role is to listen, recognize, and guide to professional resources. It is not to accompany, advise on health, or solve personal problems. This clear boundary protects both the collaborator and the manager.
Knowing the resources available in their organization is therefore an essential managerial skill. What is the procedure for accessing occupational health? Does the company have an EAP (Employee Assistance Program)? Is there a RPS referent, an internal social network, support groups? The manager must be able to answer these questions and propose the appropriate resources without hesitation — a long response time or a vague answer sends the signal that the company does not take these issues seriously.
📋 Concrete actions
- Know and be able to immediately communicate the contact details of occupational health, EAP, and the RPS referent in the organization
- Propose resources by formulating an invitation, not an injunction: “If you wish, there is a confidential listening device available — here’s how to access it”
- Follow up after the referral: “Have you had the opportunity to contact [resource]? How did it go?” — without asking for the content of the exchanges
- If the situation seems urgent (very alarming statements, intense crying, mentions of dark thoughts): immediately contact HR and the occupational health service — do not stay alone in the face of a crisis situation
Take care of your own mental health — the manager is not a superhero
The 7 previous actions can only be effectively implemented if the manager themselves is in good psychological health. However, the statistics are concerning: 48% of managers are in a state of moderate to severe exhaustion (Malakoff Humanis, 2023) — and an exhausted manager cannot prevent burnout in their team. They no longer have the emotional availability to detect weak signals, the energy to create a safe space, or the serenity to manage tensions without amplifying them. The analogy of the oxygen mask on the plane applies perfectly: the manager must first equip themselves.
Taking care of one's own mental health means for a manager: identifying their own warning signals (theirs, not generic ones), openly communicating with their own manager about their workload and support needs, taking real breaks during the workday, engaging in regular physical activity (documented as the most effective stress regulation factor), and using the available resources in their organization when needed. This is not a luxury — it is a condition for their long-term managerial performance.
📋 Concrete actions
- Personally identify their top three warning signals (the behaviors that appear when overloaded) and share this information with their own manager
- Block out "non-activity" slots in their own calendar — no meetings, no emails, no calls — just as one would block time for important meetings
- Regularly engage in physical activity (at least 3 times 30 minutes per week) — aerobic exercise is the most neurologically documented stress management technique
- Use the EAP and occupational health themselves if necessary — and normalize this behavior by mentioning it to their team (“I used the listening device — it’s helpful”)
Detecting and preventing burnout in your team
The training that structures and deepens each of these 8 actions: concrete tools, situational exercises, observation grids, conversation protocols. For managers who want to move from “I know it’s important” to “I know exactly how to do it.” 100% online, at your own pace, multi-licenses.
Access the training →Action plan: deploy the 8 actions over 12 months
| Period | Priority actions | What changes concretely | Progress indicator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Month 1 | Actions 1, 2, 4 — Foundations | Workload assessment, stopping nighttime emails, enrolling in DYNSEO training | Workload dashboard created, baseline profile per collaborator established |
| Months 2–3 | Actions 3, 5 — Relationship and culture | Structured 1:1s in place, team weather launched, errors managed without blame | Rate of 1:1s conducted ≥ 90%, energy score collected each week |
| Months 4–6 | Actions 6, 7 — Rituals and orientation | Well-being rituals integrated, available resources known and communicated | Meetings with well-being point ≥ 80%, resources listed and accessible |
| Ongoing | Action 8 — Self | Sports practice, personal disconnection, monthly self-assessment | Stable personal energy score ≥ 6/10, no month with more than 20 hours of overload |
🎯 Expected results after 12 months of implementation
According to benchmarks from companies that have trained and supported their managers on these 8 actions: reduction of average team absenteeism by 15 to 25% · improvement of engagement score (+12 points on average) · no severe burnout cases in monitored teams · improvement of work quality measured by performance indicators · reduction of turnover by 15 to 30%. These results require regular and consistent implementation over time — burnout prevention is not a one-time project, it is a permanent managerial practice.
The synergies between the 8 actions
These 8 actions do not function independently of one another — they reinforce each other. Psychological safety (action 5) is the condition that makes individual meetings (action 3) and well-being rituals (action 6) truly effective — without it, these spaces remain formal and superficial. Mastery of workload (action 1) is the condition that allows the right to disconnect (action 2) to be genuinely exercised — chronic overload negates the effect of any disconnection charter. And the health of the manager themselves (action 8) is the condition for the whole — an exhausted manager cannot create a protective environment for their team.
That is why the DYNSEO training Detecting and preventing burnout in your team addresses these dimensions in an integrated manner rather than as a list of isolated techniques — managers who have taken the training report that understanding the underlying mechanisms of burnout helps them prioritize their actions more coherently and maintain their practices over time.
❓ FAQ — Preventing burn-out as a manager
1. What action to start with if none of these 8 have been done?
If you must choose only one action to start, choose action 3 (structured 1:1 meetings with questions about workload) or action 2 (stop sending emails in the evening). These two actions have the best effort/impact ratio in the first weeks. Action 3 creates a regular dialogue space that allows all the others to take root. Action 2 sends a strong cultural signal about managerial values without requiring any tools or budget. If you are yourself in a state of exhaustion, start with action 8 — nothing can work if you are not in a good state yourself.
2. How to introduce the question of well-being into team rituals without it seeming forced?
The key is consistency over time and authenticity in the manner. The first time you ask "how do you feel?" in a meeting, the team may be surprised or wary. By the tenth time, it has become normal. The golden rule: start with yourself, sincerely — not with a superficial answer ("great, full of energy!"), but with an honest answer ("this week it's a 6/10, I have a difficult project"). This authentic vulnerability of the manager is the most powerful lever to destigmatize the conversation about state within a professional team.
3. What to do when the pressure from above generates overload in my team?
This is one of the most difficult situations for a middle manager — they are under pressure downwards (to protect the team) and upwards (to respond to the demands of their own hierarchy). The right posture is both downward and upward. Downward: protect the team by absorbing what you can, clearly prioritizing what is done and what is not, refusing additional tasks when capacity is saturated. Upward: report the actual workload data to your own manager, with facts (workload indicators, overtime, absenteeism) rather than impressions — this is an essential role of the middle manager that few take on due to a lack of tools to do so.
4. How to manage a collaborator who refuses to acknowledge their exhaustion and insists they are fine?
Denial is often the first defensive reflex of an exhausted collaborator — particularly among highly engaged and high-performing profiles. In this scenario, do not insist in the same conversation. What you can do: note the conversation (date, what you observed, their response) and plan to follow up with them in a week or two. "I respect your point of view, but I will continue to monitor closely and get back to you." If the signals continue to worsen, escalate to HR and refer to occupational health — the medical visit initiated by the employee is anonymous and protected, while the one initiated by the employer on recommendation can also be proposed as part of enhanced follow-up.
5. Are all these actions compatible with remote or hybrid management?
Yes — with specific adaptations for each action. 1:1s work via videoconference but require particular attention to connection quality (camera on if possible, quiet place). Team weather can be done at the beginning of a collective video call. Observing weak signals in hybrid mode requires compensating for the loss of visual contact with increased attention to digital signals (frequency of messages, response time, quality of contributions in meetings). The right to disconnect is often more difficult to respect for remote teams — it requires even more explicit communication from the manager. The DYNSEO training incorporates these specificities of hybrid management into its approach.
6. How to convince your own management to invest time in these actions?
With data. Calculate the cost of a single burn-out stoppage in your team (3 to 6 months of loaded salary + replacement cost + impact on the team = 30,000 to 80,000 euros for an average executive) and compare it to the time invested in these 8 actions (about 1 to 2 additional hours per week for the manager). The ROI is evident. Add legal data (safety obligation, DUERP, risk of gross negligence) — your management has a legal obligation to act, not just an ethical option. The DYNSEO training, documentable in the DUERP and fundable through OPCO, is often the simplest investment to validate.
7. Should we explicitly talk about burn-out in team meetings?
Naming burn-out explicitly in team meetings can help destigmatize the subject — but the way to do it matters greatly. Using the word "burn-out" in a context of positive prevention ("we are implementing rituals to prevent anyone from reaching exhaustion") is different from using it in a context of urgency or judgment. In practice, most managers find it more natural to talk about "well-being," "workload," and "energy" in everyday conversations, and to mention burn-out explicitly during specific communication about the company's prevention policy or during collective training.
8. Can DYNSEO training be attended by managers who show no signs of difficulty in their team?
Yes — and this is even the most effective format. Training managers in burn-out prevention before their team shows signs of difficulty is infinitely more effective than training them in reaction to a deteriorating situation. The DYNSEO training "Detecting and preventing burn-out in your team" is designed precisely for this preventive positioning — it develops skills and managerial reflexes that improve the quality of management on a daily basis, regardless of the current risk level of the team. Managers who attend it in a "normal" situation then have a skill capital available immediately if their context changes.
Did this content help you? Support DYNSEO 💙
We are a small team of 14 people based in Paris. For 13 years, we have been creating free content to help families, speech therapists, care homes and healthcare professionals.
Your feedback is the only way we know if our work is useful. A Google review helps us reach other families, caregivers and therapists who need it.
One action, 30 seconds: leave us a Google review ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐. It costs nothing, and it changes everything for us.
