Professional secrecy and family information on disorders
When an elderly loved one starts to lose track, forget appointments, or get lost on a familiar route, the family often encounters a phrase that disarms them: “I can't tell you anything, I am bound by professional secrecy.” The doctor, nurse, home caregiver, or staff of an institution are not trying to hide anything: they are applying an old, protective rule, and sometimes it feels like a wall to those who love and worry. Understanding this rule, knowing what it really allows and what it prohibits, changes everything in the relationship with caregivers.
This article takes the time to explain medical secrecy from the perspective of both families and professionals. It does not replace any legal advice or medical opinion: it provides clear guidelines to understand why certain information circulates, why others remain confidential, and how, concretely, a loved one can be involved in the care pathway of a person with cognitive disorders, without ever forcing the door of their intimacy.
The essentials in 30 seconds
The professional secrecy protects information regarding a person's health. In France, it applies to all health professionals and those in the medico-social sector, under penalty of criminal sanctions. It belongs to the patient, not to their family.
- The principle — a professional does not share medical information without the consent of the person concerned, even with their children or spouse.
- The exceptions — the law provides for specific cases where information circulates: among professionals of the same care team, with the trusted person, or to protect a vulnerable person.
- The trusted person — designated in writing by the patient, they are the primary contact for caregivers and can receive certain information on their behalf.
- Cognitive disorders — when a person can no longer express their will, specific rules apply: protective measures, trusted person, collection of advance directives.
- The right reflex — anticipate. Designating a trusted person and discussing one's wishes while fully capable avoids blockages later on.
The professional secret, what are we talking about ?
The professional secret is not a courtesy or a job habit : it is an obligation. It refers to the duty, for certain people due to their role, not to disclose the information they learn in the course of their activity. In health matters, we speak more specifically of medical confidentiality. It covers everything the professional has seen, heard, understood, or deduced about a person : a diagnosis, a treatment, a test result, but also a confidence, a family situation, a financial difficulty mentioned in consultation.
The underlying logic is simple and profoundly human. To receive care, a person must be able to confide without fear. If they feared that their words would be repeated, they would withhold symptoms, hide habits, avoid certain topics — and would receive less effective care. Therefore, secrecy does not exist to protect the professional : it exists to protect the patient, and to make care possible. It is a pillar of the trust on which the entire care relationship rests.
Medical confidentiality, confidentiality, discretion : concepts to distinguish
These words are often used interchangeably, while they do not cover the same thing. Confusing them perpetuates many misunderstandings in families.
Medical confidentiality
A legal obligation that is punishable by law, which weighs on health and medico-social professionals. Its violation is a crime.
Confidentiality
The concrete protection of data : files stored, low voice exchanges, limited computer access. It is the practical application of secrecy on a daily basis.
Discretion
A duty of reserve, often contractual, which also concerns administrative or service staff. Less strong than medical confidentiality, but real.
Remember this hierarchy : medical confidentiality is the strongest protection, backed by criminal law. When a caregiver invokes “ the secret ”, they are not hiding behind a pretext : they are applying a rule whose non-compliance can cost them dearly, professionally and legally.
What the law says about medical confidentiality
In France, medical confidentiality is based on several texts that complement each other. It is not just a simple ethical rule : it is an obligation enshrined in law, with criminal consequences in case of breach. Knowing these foundations helps to understand why a professional cannot “ make an exception ” even when the family's request seems legitimate.
| Text | What it states |
|---|---|
| Article L.1110-4 of the Public Health Code | Every person receiving care has the right to respect for their privacy and the confidentiality of information concerning them. This is the reference text. |
| Article 226-13 of the Penal Code | The disclosure of confidential information by a person who is its custodian is an offense, punishable by one year of imprisonment and a fine of 15,000 euros. |
| Medical Code of Ethics | The confidentiality covers everything that has come to the physician's knowledge in the exercise of their profession: what has been entrusted to them, but also what they have seen, heard, or understood. |
| Article L.1111-7 of the Public Health Code | The patient has a right to direct access to all information in their medical file. |
Two ideas emerge from this set. First, confidentiality is general and absolute in principle: there are no "small secrets" that can be shared more easily than others. Second, this confidentiality belongs to the patient, not to the professional. This is a crucial nuance: the caregiver is the guardian of the information, but the person concerned remains in control. They can decide to involve their family or, on the contrary, to tell them nothing — and this choice is binding on the professional.
Many families think that once their loved one is admitted to a Nursing home or hospital, they will be automatically informed of everything. This is not the case. The facility remains subject to confidentiality. The information provided to the family depends on what the person has authorized, the designation of a trusted person, and the capacity of the individual to express their wishes. Anticipation, once again, makes all the difference.
Who is bound by confidentiality, and regarding which information
One might spontaneously imagine that only the physician is concerned. In reality, the circle of people bound by confidentiality is much larger. Surrounding a vulnerable elderly person is a whole set of caregivers, and almost all of them are bound by an obligation of confidentiality, to varying degrees.
A circle much larger than just the physician
| Professional | Bound by confidentiality? | Details |
|---|---|---|
| General practitioner, specialist | Yes | Medical confidentiality in the strict sense, legally protected. |
| Nurse, nursing assistant | Yes | Subject to confidentiality in the context of their care. |
| Physiotherapist, speech therapist, occupational therapist | Yes | Healthcare professionals, bound by confidentiality. |
| Psychologist, neuropsychologist | Yes | Bound by professional confidentiality. |
| Home caregiver, life assistant | Yes | Duty of discretion and confidentiality regarding the private life of the person assisted. |
| Administrative staff of a facility | Partially | Obligation of discretion regarding the information they are aware of. |
| Social service assistant | Yes | Subject to professional confidentiality. |
What confidentiality covers is equally vast. It is not limited to diagnosis. It encompasses the very existence of care (the mere fact that a person consults a particular specialist), ongoing treatments, psychological state, examination results, but also elements of private life discovered during care: the isolation of a person, a family conflict situation, material difficulties. All of this is confidential.
The secret does not mean that the professional refuses to speak "by principle". It means that they cannot speak without the consent of the person concerned. The right question to ask is therefore not "Why aren't you telling me anything?" but "Has my mother authorized you to inform me, and if not, how can she do so?". This formulation opens a door that the first one closes.
At home, a network of concerned caregivers
The maintenance of an elderly person at home often involves several services: a home nursing service, home help, meal delivery, a physiotherapist who visits, and sometimes a tele-assistance service. Each of these caregivers learns, over the course of their visits, intimate details of the person's life. All are bound to confidentiality, including those for whom it is not the core of their caregiving profession. A home helper should not share the health status of the person they assist with the neighbors, nor comment with a family member on what another professional has disclosed. This discretion, sometimes so subtle it seems like silence, protects the assisted person during a time of great vulnerability.
For the family, this multiplicity can be disorienting. One would prefer a single point of contact who centralizes everything. This is precisely the role that a well-identified trusted person can play, or, at home, the attending physician, a natural pivot for coordination. Rather than questioning each caregiver separately, it is better to build a clear link with this pivot and let the professionals coordinate among themselves within the framework provided by law.
What the family can learn, and what remains closed to them
This is the question that comes up most often, and the source of the greatest frustrations. The answer is neither "the family has all the rights" nor "the family has no rights". It all depends on the will of the person concerned, their condition, and the status of the one who is asking.
The principle: nothing without the consent of the interested party
As long as a person is able to express their will, they alone decide what they share. A professional cannot inform the spouse, children, or siblings without their consent. This may seem harsh when one is genuinely concerned, but it is the price of respecting autonomy: an elderly person remains, until the end and unless protective measures are taken, the master of their life and their information.
What can be shared, and under what conditions
| Situation | Can the family be informed ? |
|---|---|
| The person expressly consents to their family being informed | Yes — the confidentiality is lifted to the extent they allow |
| A trusted person has been designated | Yes — they receive the necessary information for support |
| The person can no longer express their wishes (coma, advanced disorders) | Partially — a relative receives supportive information, framed |
| Serious diagnosis : the person agrees that relatives be supported | Yes — unless they oppose it |
| The person clearly opposes any information to their family | No — their refusal is binding on the professional |
| An adult child requests the medical file of their living parent, without a mandate | No — the file belongs to the patient |
The specific case of serious diagnosis
The law provides flexibility for difficult situations. In the case of a serious diagnosis or prognosis, relatives, family, or the trusted person can receive the necessary information to directly support the sick person — unless the person has opposed it. The spirit of the text is protective : it aims to allow the entourage to accompany, not to disclose everything. The professional transmits what helps to support, not the entirety of the file.
Rather than demanding information, help your relative to formulate their consent in front of the caregiver. A sentence is enough : « Doctor, I authorize my son, present here, to be informed of my condition and to communicate with you. » Better yet, have it recorded in the file. From then on, the professional has a clear framework to communicate with you.
The trusted person, the role that changes everything
If there were only one provision to retain from this article, it would be this one. The trusted person is probably the most useful and least known tool in health law. It is provided for by article L.1111-6 of the Public Health Code, and yet many families discover its existence too late, at the precise moment when it is no longer possible to designate one.
Who are they, and what is their purpose ?
The trusted person is a relative — spouse, child, friend, sometimes the attending physician — who is designated in writing to be accompanied and represented in their care journey. They fulfill two distinct missions that must be well understood.
Accompany
As long as the person can express themselves, the trusted person assists them in their procedures, can be present at consultations, and help them understand the information received.
Testify to the will
If the person can no longer express themselves, the trusted person is consulted as a priority by the healthcare team. They testify to what the patient would have wanted.
Receive information
In these situations, they become the privileged interlocutor of the caregivers and receive the necessary information to accompany and voice the person.
How to designate them, concretely
- Choose the right person. Someone trustworthy, available, capable of expressing the wishes of the patient even if they are not their own. It is not necessarily the heir or the eldest: it is the one who will be able to voice the person's needs.
- Formalize in writing. The designation is made on plain paper or on the form provided by the establishment or the doctor. It is dated and signed, and co-signed by the designated person who accepts the role.
- Keep and distribute it. The document is given to the attending physician, added to the medical file, and a copy is kept by the trusted person. It is mentioned at each hospitalization.
- Revise if necessary. The designation can be revised and revoked at any time. It can be changed without justification.
A trusted person can only be designated by someone who is still able to express their will. For a person whose cognitive disorders are worsening, the window to do so is closing. That is why it is important to talk about it early, at the first signs, even before any diagnosis, as one calmly prepares an important question. Failing to designate them in time deprives the family of their best link with the caregivers.
Preserving cognitive autonomy also means preserving the ability to decide
SCARLETT is DYNSEO's cognitive stimulation application designed for seniors: memory, attention, and language games adapted for use on tablets, to maintain the functions that allow everyone to remain an actor in their choices.
Discover SCARLETTCognitive disorders: when the person can no longer consent alone
This is the heart of the problem for many families. A person with Alzheimer's disease, a related illness, or another progressive cognitive disorder sees their ability to understand and decide gradually diminish. What happens to medical confidentiality in this case? How is the family informed without betraying the person's intimacy?
The ability to consent is not all or nothing
The first essential idea: a diagnosis of cognitive disorder does not automatically deprive a person of their right to information and confidentiality. The ability to consent is assessed on a case-by-case basis, situation by situation. A person may no longer be able to manage a complex budget while still being perfectly capable of saying who they wish to inform about their health. Respect involves continuing to address them, seeking their opinion, as long as possible — and not talking about them over their head as soon as the diagnosis is announced.
The moment of announcement: being present without taking over the conversation
The consultation where a diagnosis of cognitive disorder is made is a delicate moment. The person concerned has the right to be informed of their condition, with tact and measure, and they also have the right not to want to know everything: this choice belongs to them. A close relative present by their side, with their consent, plays a valuable role: they provide comfort, help to rephrase what has been said, and retain practical information that the person, under the influence of emotion, may not always register. The pitfall to avoid is taking the person's place: answering on their behalf, deciding that "nothing should be said to avoid worrying them," or speaking about them to the doctor as if they were not there. As long as they understand, we address them first. It is a matter of dignity as much as of right.
The systems that organize information for the family
| System | Role | To anticipate |
|---|---|---|
| Trusted person | Contact person for caregivers, witness of the will | To be designated early, as long as the person can |
| Advance directives | Written wishes regarding care and end of life | Drafted in advance, revisable at any time |
| Future protection mandate | Organize their own protection in advance | Established before a notary or by private deed |
| Court protection measure (guardianship, curatorship, family authorization) | A relative is designated by the judge to represent or assist | Judicial procedure, as a last resort |
The protection measure does not grant all rights
This is a common confusion: obtaining guardianship does not mean obtaining unlimited access to the medical confidentiality of the protected relative. The person in charge of protection is involved in decisions to the extent provided by the judge and by law, but respect for the dignity and privacy of the protected person remains. Their consent is still sought when they are able to express it on the matter at hand. Protection is a framework for assistance, not a general lifting of confidentiality.
You do not need access to the medical file to be helpful. Note what you observe daily — a missing word, disorientation, a fall, a change in mood — and pass it on to the doctor or the team. This information flows in the right direction (from the family to the caregiver) and does not breach any confidentiality. It is valuable for adjusting care. A simple shared notebook can help with this; you will find printable resources in the DYNSEO tools catalog.
The sharing of information between professionals
A question often confuses families: "How is it that the nurse knows what the doctor said, while I am told that it is confidential?" The answer lies in a precise notion: the care team. Confidentiality is not compartmentalized between each professional; it is shared, within certain limits, among those who participate in the care of the same person.
Shared confidentiality, a necessity for proper care
The law organizes what is called the sharing of information between professionals. The idea is common sense: for care to be coherent, the doctor, nurse, physiotherapist, and social worker must be able to exchange useful information for coordination. This sharing is not free, however. It follows clear rules.
The principle of necessity
Only the information strictly necessary for coordination and continuity of care is shared. Not everything, not out of curiosity.
The scope of the team
Sharing occurs between team members who are actually taking care of the person. An outside professional does not have access by right.
The person's information
The person is informed of this sharing and can oppose it for certain information. They retain control.
This mechanism explains why, within the same establishment or a network of coordinated care, information circulates among caregivers without constituting a breach of confidentiality. However, the same information cannot be transmitted to a third party outside the care pathway — a neighbor, a family friend, an employer — without crossing the forbidden line.
Being part of the entourage does not make you a member of the care team. The fact that professionals exchange information among themselves does not give you, by extension, a right to access these exchanges. Your entry point remains the agreement of your loved one or your status as a trusted person. This is a boundary that families sometimes mentally cross, incorrectly, and which explains many misunderstandings.
In practice: asking, transmitting, being informed
Enough principles: how to act concretely when you are a relative of an elderly person whose health is declining? Here are the steps that work, respecting the legal framework, and those that, on the contrary, unnecessarily alienate caregivers.
Being legitimately involved, in four steps
- Talk with your loved one, first. Everything starts with them. Calmly approach the subject: do they want you to be informed, present, involved in decisions? Respect their answer, even if partial. This is the basis for everything that follows.
- Designate a trusted person. If your loved one wishes, help them fill out and sign the document, then submit it to their doctor and the establishment. This is the action that has the most effect on your ability to be informed later.
- Record their consent in the file. A written, dated, and signed mention by the person, indicating who they authorize to be informed, gives the caregiver a secure framework to exchange with you.
- Attend consultations with them. Nothing replaces presence. You listen, you take notes, you ask your questions, and you support your loved one over time, without any administrative steps.
Accompany your loved one to the consultation
The simplest and most respectful way is to be present, with the person's consent. In consultation, by their side, you hear the same information as they do, you can ask questions, note instructions, and help them remember later. No secret is violated since it is the person themselves who associates you. This is often the best way to stay informed without ever breaching the framework.
Request access to the medical file
The medical file belongs to the patient. Therefore, it is they, and they alone while alive, who can request access (Article L.1111-7 of the Public Health Code). A relative can only access it if expressly mandated, or in specific cases provided by law.
| Who requests | Access to the file ? |
|---|---|
| The patient themselves | Yes — direct and complete access |
| A relative mandated in writing by the patient | Yes — within the limits of the mandate |
| The guardian, within the scope of their mission | Partially — according to the measure and respect for the person |
| A child, for a living parent, without a mandate | No |
| An heir, after death, in specific cases | Partially — for a legitimate reason defined by law |
After death : a secret that endures, but softens
The medical secret does not extinguish with the person. However, the law grants heirs, the partner, or the partner linked by a civil solidarity pact a limited right of access to certain information in the file, under three conditions : to know the causes of death, to defend the memory of the deceased, or to assert their rights. Access is limited to the information necessary for one of these objectives, and only if the person had not opposed it during their lifetime.
Do not seek to bypass the secret : seek to be legitimately associated. In practical terms : encourage your relative to designate you as a trusted person, to record their consent in their file, and offer to be present at consultations. These three simple gestures resolve the vast majority of information difficulties — much better than a standoff with the care team.
Common misconceptions about medical secrecy
Medical secrecy carries its share of stubborn beliefs. Correcting a few of them avoids unnecessary conflicts with caregivers and disappointed expectations.
“ I am their child, they must tell me everything ”
False. The family link, even the closest, does not automatically grant any right to the health information of an adult capable of expressing themselves. It is the person's will, not the degree of kinship, that opens access to information. A friend designated as a trusted person will be more informed than a son who has not been designated.
“ In a nursing home, the facility will keep me informed of everything ”
False. The facility remains subject to secrecy. It will inform you within the framework defined by your relative : trusted person, recorded consent, or emergency situations. Outside of this framework, it cannot share everything, even if it perceives your concern as legitimate.
“ With guardianship, I will have access to everything ”
False. The protective measure organizes assistance or representation within the limits set by the judge. It does not turn the guardian into the owner of medical confidentiality. The respect for the dignity and privacy of the protected person remains, and their opinion is sought when they can provide it.
“ The doctor refuses to talk to me, he has something to hide ”
False, almost always. The refusal to communicate without consent is not an admission : it is the application of an obligation. Interpreting confidentiality as concealment unnecessarily damages the care relationship. It is better to ask how to be legitimately involved.
“ Confidentiality disappears when the person is very ill ”
False in principle. Even in cases of serious illness, informing relatives is done with respect for the person's wishes. The law allows for support from those around, but “ unless opposed ” by the interested party : their refusal, if expressed, continues to apply.
When confidentiality becomes a wall : disagreements and difficult cases
It would be dishonest to present medical confidentiality as a smooth river. In the real lives of families, it sometimes creates painful situations : a parent who refuses to inform their children, a sibling rivalry, an isolated relative putting their health at risk. These cases exist, and they must be faced.
When the person refuses to inform their family
This may be the most painful situation. A person still capable of deciding may choose not to tell their children, out of modesty, a desire to protect them, or an old disagreement. Their choice must be respected, no matter how difficult it is for those around them. The caregiver's role is not to resolve the family conflict, but to respect the wishes of their patient. What the family can do : remain present, maintain the connection, and let the person know that they will be there if they change their mind. The door left open matters more than one might think.
Threatening a caregiver, demanding, or trying to obtain information from a more “ talkative ” intervener does not work and deteriorates trust. A professional who would yield would expose themselves to legal action, and your relative might experience this intrusion as a betrayal. Patience and direct dialogue with the concerned person remain the only legitimate levers.
When silence puts the person in danger
The law does not ignore situations where confidentiality can no longer prevail. The professional has the possibility, and sometimes the duty, to act in the face of a vulnerable person in danger. There are exceptions provided for reporting situations of abuse or danger concerning a person who is unable to protect themselves. In these extreme cases, the professional is no longer bound to silence in the same way : the protection of the person becomes a priority.
Disagreements within the family
When several relatives claim the role of interlocutor, the clarity of the arrangements makes perfect sense. A clearly designated trusted person, written advance directives, a protection measure defined by the judge: these frameworks prevent caregivers from having to arbitrate between family members who do not agree. This is one more reason for the person still able to decide to organize things in advance rather than leaving chance and tensions to decide for them.
If you are facing discomfort, a serious fall, loss of consciousness, or any alarming signs, immediately contact the emergency services in your country. No question of confidentiality should delay a call for help: medical urgency always takes precedence, and professionals will then share the necessary information without delay to save the person.
To go further
Medical confidentiality is part of a broader set of guidelines to support an elderly relative. These other articles in the series each delve into a complementary aspect:
ProtectGuardianship, curatorship, family authorization: choosing the right protection measure
CommunicateHow to communicate well with the caregiving team of a relative losing autonomy
SupportStay informed and helpful without betraying your relative's privacy
On the resources side: the DYNSEO tools catalog offers printable materials, such as liaison notebooks and observation grids, useful for conveying to professionals what you observe on a daily basis. The cognitive tests allow for an initial assessment of memory or attention before discussing it with the primary care physician.
Frequently Asked Questions
My mother is in a Nursing home, why am I not being told anything about her health ?
Because the establishment is subject to medical confidentiality, just like a hospital. The family relationship does not automatically grant the right to information. To be kept informed, the most effective way is for your mother to designate you as a trusted person in writing and record her consent in her file, as long as she can express her wishes. If her cognitive disorders are advanced and no arrangement has been made, the team may provide you with limited supportive information, but not necessarily the entire file. The best approach is to discuss the matter with the establishment to formalize your role within the rules.
Does the trusted person have access to the entire medical file ?
No, not in an unlimited way. The trusted person is the primary contact for caregivers : they receive the necessary information to support the person and, if that person can no longer express themselves, to testify to their wishes. This does not equate to complete access to the medical file, which belongs to the patient. As long as the person can decide, the trusted person assists them without replacing them. Their role is to be a reliable intermediary and witness to what the patient would have wanted, respecting their privacy, not to consult everything.
Can I obtain my father's medical file while he is alive ?
Only if he has expressly authorized you in writing, or if you are his guardian acting within the scope of your duties. The medical file belongs to the patient : while alive, only they have direct and complete access, under Article L.1111-7 of the Public Health Code. Without authorization, a child cannot demand their parent's file. The simplest solution remains to accompany your father to the consultation, with his consent : you then hear the information directly, without any particular procedure or violation of confidentiality.
What happens to medical confidentiality after my loved one passes away ?
Medical confidentiality extends beyond death, but the law grants heirs, the spouse, the partner, or the civil partner limited access to certain information in the file. This access is possible for three specific reasons : to know the causes of death, to defend the memory of the deceased, or to assert their rights. It is limited to the information necessary for the stated objective and only applies if the person did not oppose it while alive. Therefore, you do not retrieve the entire file, but only the elements useful for the legitimate reason you present.
Can a caregiver break confidentiality to protect a vulnerable person ?
Yes, in specific situations. The law provides exceptions that allow, and sometimes require, reporting a situation of danger or abuse concerning a person who is unable to protect themselves. In these cases, the protection of the person takes precedence over silence. Similarly, in cases of life-threatening emergencies, no confidentiality should delay calling the emergency services in your country or sharing the necessary information with rescuers. Confidentiality protects the person : it never works against their safety when their life or integrity is at stake.
This article aims to provide general information about professional secrecy and family information. It does not replace personalized legal advice or medical opinion. The rules may vary depending on the situations and countries. For a specific situation, consult your treating physician, the care team, or a legal professional.
More than 30 cognitive stimulation games designed for seniors and vulnerable people, with gentle and progressive support, on tablet.
Discover →
Maintaining memory helps everyone stay in control of their choices
Respecting professional secrecy is based on a strong idea: each person decides for themselves as long as they can. Regular cognitive stimulation supports this autonomy. SCARLETT offers seniors memory, attention, and language games that are adapted and progressive, to be practiced gently on tablet.
Discover SCARLETTDid this content help you? Support DYNSEO 💙
We are a small team of 14 people based in Paris. For 13 years, we have been creating free content to help families, speech therapists, care homes and healthcare professionals.
Your feedback is the only way we know if our work is useful. A Google review helps us reach other families, caregivers and therapists who need it.
One action, 30 seconds: leave us a Google review ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐. It costs nothing, and it changes everything for us.
